Sarvadarshi - Chintana - How do you know who is main subject of the book?

DRAFT

Each work of Madhwa Tatwa, Granthas, principles have lots of defined and well agreed rules and guidelines. These are called popularly as PRASAKTI. If you loose prasakti one can really go wrong in understanding the core thought presented. This is how our all siddhanthas, granthas are today attacked by attackers as they remove Prasanga & Prasakti and tell the story in opposite way.

Also, one should appreciate our Dharma Granthas that have kept everything openly talked instead of just being written in "IDEALISTIC WAY" ( presenting only good parts and hiding other stuffs ).

If required Sri Vedavyasaru would have written Mahabharatha in most IDEALISTIC way. For example, like Kaurava attacked and as defensive pandava killed them and would have shown only ideal characters of pandavas. Thus making our new questioning generation believe it as a good Grantha. This is exactly how other dharmaGranthas are written. Show only good and hide confusing items.

So why its been written like that? How still Madhwas gets purity of it and learn and understand?

For this there are many rules been put few of them i would like to explain.

1. The topic starts and ends with a particular subject that means that is the core part of it.

Ex1: Mahabharatha starts with Narayanam Suragurum... and ends with vishnu sloka. This means whole book is written to explain subject person Krishna/Vishnu. All other things become supplemented topics to justify this. 

Ex2. Sri Harivayustuthi - starts with Narasimha and ends with Narasimha

This is what exactly Srimadanand teertharu asked to add to Vayustuthi. To uphold Vishnu Sarvottamatwa first.

2. Mangalacharana covers main subject

Narayanam suragurum... starts with Narayana itself so whole book/grantha will tell about Narayana.

Many situations within the grantha also upholds Vishnu Sarvottamatwa as explained really well by Sri Madhwacharyaru in Mahabharatha Tatparya Nirnaya.

Thus one cannot just go by what is seen outside with out relating it to references, rules that are agreed and also relations. 

So dont get just be confused by attackers examples like "Draupadi had 5 husband etc".

This is one of the approach given by all our Granthas to tell us that how one should write any books. Any book with out references is not worthy which we know. Any book that does not relate well is waste. The book starts with a topic and concludes with a topic which is same. Means that is what authors inner writing intention. So you wont get confused in understanding authors inner intention.